Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Comments on How to determine the target(s) of Catapult?

Parent

How to determine the target(s) of Catapult?

+4
−0

In the D&D 5th Edition Player's Handbook Spellcasting section, under Casting a Spell, we find a loose definition of "target" for spells.

A typical spell requires you to pick one or more targets to be affected by the spell's magic. A spell's description tells you whether the spell targets creatures, objects, or a point of origin for an area of effect [...]

Knowing what a spell targets, or at least having a way to consistently adjudicate edge cases is important. Not only for adjudicating the effects of the spell, but also for interaction with other game mechanics, such as the sorcerer's Twin Spell Metamagic feature, which requires a spell to be incapable of targeting more than one creature, or the charmed condition, which prevents a creature from targeting the charmer with harmful abilities or magical effects.


The Elemental Evil Player’s Companion supplement introduced the catapult spell, which has me a little puzzled on how to rule.

The relevant sections from the description of catapult seem to be as follows:

Choose one object weighing 1 to 5 pounds within range that isn't being worn or carried. The object flies in a straight line up to 90 feet in a direction you choose[...]

[...] If the object would strike a creature, that creature must make a Dexterity saving throw. On a failed save, the object strikes the target and stops moving. [...]

Given that a creature that fails the Dexterity saving throw is referred to as a target specifically, that seems pretty clear. But what about a creature who succeeds? Should that creature be considered a target? What about a creature who never makes a saving throw because the object stopped before it reached them?


If a Mage catapults an object toward Alice, Bob and Charlie, who are standing in a straight line, as shown:

M o A B C

Then Alice succeeds on her saving throw, Bob fails his and the object stops, so Charlie never makes one. Are Alice and Bob both targets of the spell? Just Bob? Alice, Bob and Charlie?

Would it make a difference if the Mage is charmed by Charlie?

History
Why does this post require moderator attention?
You might want to add some details to your flag.
Why should this post be closed?

0 comment threads

Post
+0
−2

None of the creatures are targeted by Catapult.

From the same sections you quoted:

A spell's description tells you whether the spell targets creatures, objects, or a point of origin for an area of effect

and

Choose one object weighing 1 to 5 pounds

Alice, Bob, and Charlie are not targets of the spell Catapult. The object is the target of the spell. The spell happens to have effects on non-targets.

History
Why does this post require moderator attention?
You might want to add some details to your flag.

1 comment thread

Too literal (4 comments)
Too literal
Quintec‭ wrote over 2 years ago

As my answer stated, a literal interpretation is typically not the way to go, especially when dealing with targets... for example, this is invalidated by some lines further down in the Catapult description that were quoted in the question: "On a failed save, the object strikes the target and stops moving"

Cereal Nommer‭ wrote over 2 years ago · edited over 2 years ago

Or not literal enough.

Nothing in the spell description actually explicitly describes the object as a target. You also choose a direction, but it's quite a stretch of the imagination to say the direction is also a "target".

The creature that fails a saving throw is literally referred to as "the target". At the very least your answer should explain why you believe that the only thing explicitly referred to in the spell description as a target would not be a target of the spell.

Dana‭ wrote over 2 years ago

The range of the spell is 60 feet and the object is what is required to be within range. That clearly makes the object the target.

This spell is not a spell attack. It's designed for object interaction. Those interactions may cause damage.

Cereal Nommer‭ wrote over 2 years ago

Dana‭ And burning hands has a range of self, and has no spell attack. Would you assume the creatures or objects in the firey cone that extends from the caster aren't targets?

You could potentially make a decent argument that the object is a target here. Lack of an attack roll, or explicitly chosen creatures doesn't exclude them from being targets.