Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Comments on How to handle time when a separated party member enters combat alone?

Post

How to handle time when a separated party member enters combat alone?

+4
−0

Several party members are in a dungeon together, but one party member has (perhaps foolishly) run off by themselves, and is now separated from the rest of the party by several hundred feet. This solo party member then encounters a monster and enters combat, but the rest of the party is too far away to be aware that there is combat taking place.

I'm wondering what is the best way to handle "combat time" in this situation:

  • The solo party member rolls for initative and enters combat, but the rest of the party remain in free-form "narrative time". This accurately reflects the fact that the rest of the party don't know that combat is happening, but also allows the solo player to wait indefinitely on his turn until the rest of the party have time to catch up (e.g. moving their tokens on a VTT). This effectively means that time is moving at a different rate for different party members, which seems like it could cause problems.

  • Everybody rolls for initiative. This solves the problem with inconsistent time tracking, and requires the rest of the party to use their turns to move their speed and catch up with the separated player. However it also implies that the rest of the party are somehow magically able to react quickly to combat that they cannot see or hear, which requires some suspension of disbelief.

  • Only the separated player rolls initiative, while the other players enter combat with an initiative of zero. A compromise solution which allows time to be tracked in rounds for the whole party without implying the whole party is magically aware of being in combat. The initiative of zero reflects the fact that the rest of the party is unaware of combat and does not have a chance to react quickly.

I'm leaning towards the third option myself, but would like to know how others would handle this and if there are any better options (or if the rules specify a particular approach).

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.
Why should this post be closed?

1 comment thread

This sounds exactly like a character in a party I'm in. Our Gloomstalker Ranger/Rogue tends to head o... (1 comment)
This sounds exactly like a character in a party I'm in. Our Gloomstalker Ranger/Rogue tends to head o...
Cereal Nommer‭ wrote over 1 year ago

This sounds exactly like a character in a party I'm in. Our Gloomstalker Ranger/Rogue tends to head off away from the group to scout ahead and triggers traps or gets ambushed by monsters with tremorsense and blindsight.