Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Were V:tM rules intentionally badly designed?

+3
−0

Rumours tell that Vampire: The Masquerade was designed with purpose to be a trainwreck when it comes to the mechanics, so that people would not use them.

Was this really the case? And what evidence is there for or against it, aside from the nature of the rules themselves and similar sentiments in the traditional RPG culture of the time?

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.
Why should this post be closed?

2 comment threads

Source? (2 comments)
That would explain SO MUCH. The chances of failure with 1s on the dice grew when you had more dice, w... (1 comment)

2 answers

You are accessing this answer with a direct link, so it's being shown above all other answers regardless of its score. You can return to the normal view.

+1
−0

From interviews of the era, as well as his AMA, I'm pretty sure that Mark Rein·Hagen didn't deliberately make the rules broken because he didn't want people to use them, but rather did so out of a combination of factors:

  1. A combined lack of grounding in (and desire to learn) the mathematics of probability to make a system that wasn't broken.
  2. A belief that the dice should be ignored if they contradicted the desired direction of storytelling: that the GM should be overriding the dummy dice anyway, so there's no need for a rigorously correct die rolling system.

There is no viable argument to refute the first point, but whether he was right on that second one is, naturally, a matter of taste. He was not, however, trying to attract the D&D crowd to his game. He was trying to bring in the non-gamer crowd of the time—and in that can hardly be viewed as a failure given that people who wouldn't have spent even a moment looking at "nerds" vicariously crawling through dungeons were brought into the gaming fold.

The World of Darkness game family (and their assorted other die pool workalikes) is not one I like. When they're not flatly mechanically broken (like the original WoD games), they're counter-intuitive and whimsical. It's not to my taste, but it's not "broken" in terms of successful game design either if people are enjoying the family.

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.

1 comment thread

more precise sources (1 comment)
+1
−2

Not sure how to answer this beyond saying I ran a V:tM campaign for six years after it came out, and the rules worked out fine for me. I wasn't super strict, perhaps, but the basic dice mechanic worked. I actually like it better than the ubiquitous single-roll style of D&D.

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.

1 comment thread

Thanks for the response, but I am looking and the question asking information on whether the rules we... (1 comment)

Sign up to answer this question »